Franklin, A., Tranter, B., & White, R. (2001). (1996). Learning to be affected: Subjectivity, sense, and sensibility in animal rights activism. Society & Animals, 21(6), 501-522. (2018). Taylor, N., & Signal, T. (2006). Greenebaum, J. Society & Animals, 4(1), 53-64. (2011). (2009). Society & Animals, 2(2), 145-165. Society & Animals, 18(1), 58-74. Levin, J., Arluke, A., & Irvine, L. (2017). (2011). Caring about blood, flesh, and pain: Women’s standing in the animal protection movement. Kruse, C. R. (1999). The Latest Issue of Society & Animals is Out! Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters: A preliminary investigation. Loveridge, A. Haque, N., & Masri, A. H. B. 110 Yale L.J. Pace Law School students, staff, and faculty have access with personal password. Nickell, D., & Herzog, H. A. ” I’m Not an Activist!”: Animal Rights vs. Attitudes and dispositional optimism of animal rights demonstrators. For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription. Block, G. (2003). Coverage is from the first issue published for all periodicals and goes through the most-currently published issues allowed based on contracts with publishers. Society & Animals, 3(1), 1-21. Kemmerer, L. (2006). Pride and Burden: The Quest for Consistency in the Anti-Speciesist Movement. Changes in animal welfare views in New Zealand: Responding to global change. Society & Animals, 2(2), 115-124. Verbal Activism:” Anymal”. You do not currently have access to this article. Gaarder, E. (2008). Available off campus with Pace portal credentials. Society & Animals, 8(1), 305-330. Fleischmann, K. (2003). Shapiro, K. (1994). “Support your local invasive species”: Animal protection rhetoric and nonnative species. Published bi-annually by a student editorial board at the University of Louisville, Brandeis School of Law. Li, P. J., & Davey, G. (2013). It is searchable and browsable by area of law, author, and institution. Brown, S. E. (2005). Munro, L. (2001). (1994). Legitimacy concerns in animal advocacy organizations during the Michael Vick dogfighting scandal. Please visit https://www.animalsandsociety.org/about-asi/website-reprint-and-use-policies to find out more about our reprint and use policies. Freeman, C. P. (2010). Requires login with Pace portal user name and password. Origin of adult animal rights lifestyle in childhood responsiveness to animal suffering. Attitudes to animals in the animal protection community compared to a normative community sample. JCAS is grounded in an opposition to animal studies and research, which exploits nonhuman animals. Contains more than 2,200 law and law-related periodicals. The principles of animal advocacy in Islam: four integrated ecognitions. Framing cruelty: The construction of duck shooting as a social problem. The “Furry” Phenomenon: Characterizing Sexual Orientation, Sexual Motivation, and Erotic Target Identity Inversions in Male Furries, Animals & Society Institute Online Privacy Policy. (2003). https://libraryguides.law.pace.edu/animals, Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, Stanford Journal of Animal Law and Policy. The under-representation of African American employees in animal welfare organizations in the United States. Are People More Disturbed by Dog or Human Suffering?. Turina, I. Goodman, J. R., & Sanders, C. R. (2011). Society & Animals, 23(1), 45-67. Society & Animals, 19(2), 137-155. (2007). The political landscape surrounding anti-cruelty legislation in Canada. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Aebersold, C., Galen, L., Stanton, V., & DeLeeuw, J. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Risk & reward: The impact of animal rights activism on women. Contesting moral capital in campaigns against animal liberation. This guide focuses on resources for research in animal rights law and includes links to primary and secondary sources. Animal rights as a post-citizenship movement. Society & Animals, 3(1), 43-60. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the social and conceptual basis for what is widely termed “animal rights.” The agricultural community has mistakenly tended to dismiss this new thinking as fringe and emotionally based. (1998). Society and Animals, 10(4), 421-428. The actual and potential contribution of economics to animal welfare issues. Support for animal rights as a function of belief in evolution, religious fundamentalism, and religious denomination. The moral reasoning of believers in animal rights. Society & Animals, 6(1), 1-11. 527 (2000)The "animal rights" movement is gathering steam, and Steven Wise is one of the pistons. The past decade has witnessed a major revolution in social concern with animals. Dietary motivations and challenges among animal rights advocates in Spain. Search by article title, author, subject, state or country published, full text, and narrow by date. There is much less … Munro, L. (2002). Newsletter from the Animal Legal Defense Fund. In favor of tipping the balance: Animal rights activists in defense of residential picketing. Culture, reform politics, and future directions: A review of China’s animal protection challenge. Society & Animals, 21(1), 34-53. Lutz, B. J., & Lutz, J. M. (2011). 1 (2005). Evans, E. (2010). Interest groups and pro-animal rights legislation. (2002). State legislators’ roll-call votes on farm animal protection bills: The agricultural connection. “I Promise to Protect Dumb Creatures”: Pastoral Power and the Limits of Victorian Nonhuman Animal Protection. Case law, statutes, Shepard's, secondary sources, and news. Wyatt, T. (2014). Society & Animals, 19(3), 279-290. Animal rights and human social issues. Bernard E. Rollin, Animal welfare, animal rights and agriculture, Journal of Animal Science, Volume 68, Issue 10, October 1990, Pages 3456–3461, https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68103456x. Search for other works by this author on: Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science. Non-human animal abuse and wildlife trade: Harm in the fur and falcon trades. Society & Animals, 26(3), 239-258. Society & Animals, 22(3), 262-288. This guide focuses on resources for research in animal rights law and includes links to primary and secondary sources. Ginsberg, C., & Lowe, B. Unless otherwise noted, all content on this website is copyright © 2020 The Animals and Society Institute. Society & Animals, 25(1), 1-16. Galvin, S. L., & Herzog, H. A. Full text available on Westlaw, Lexis, and Environmental Studies & Policy Collection. Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: Overcoming contextual constraints. Society & Animals, 19(1), 83-101. Society & Animals, 10(2), 173-191. Society & Animals, 14(3), 265-274. Us and them: Scientists’ and animal rights campaigners’ views of the animal experimentation debate. The Latest Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) Issue—Vol 23, No. idea and a movement that asserts that animals should be able to live free of human interference and that they should never be exploited for human gain Gerber, B., & Young, K. (2013). Guéguen, N. (2013). Kew, B. Harfeld, J. Frog and cyberfrog are friends: Dissection simulation and animal advocacy. Most users should sign in with their email address. Articles available beginning with vol. (2018). Includes working papers and articles in the social sciences, including law. Society & Animals, 9(2), 127-144. Ethical Considerations and Advances in the Understanding of Animal Cognition. Ethical ideology and moral persuasion: Personal moral philosophy, gender, and judgments of pro-and anti-animal research propaganda. Society & Animals, 18(3), 231-250. Greenebaum, J. Are We A Society Based on Equality If We Aren’t Considering Animal Rights As Equal To Human Rights? (2018). Apprehension around burgeoning medical research in the late 1800s and the first half of the 20 th century sparked concerns over the use of humans and animals in research , .Suspicions around the use of humans were deepened with the revelation of several exploitive research projects, including a series of … Redesigning the donation box: The effect of animal banks on donations for animal welfare. Horse play in the Canadian west: The emergence of the Calgary Stampede as contested terrain. Society & Animals, 26(3), 335-338. ASI’s tax identification number is 22-2527462. Munro, L. (1999). In actuality, it is a natural extension of earlier social thought. This site, hosted by bepress, provides open-access legal scholarship from over 200 institutions. Society & Animals, 11(2), 167-180. Society & Animals, 16(2), 149-170. Raise Funds for the Animals and Society Institute, Defining Human-Animal Studies: An ASI Video Project, ASI-UIUC Summer Institute for Human-Animal Studies, The ASI-WAS Human-Animal Studies Fellowship, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science Archive, Articles on Animal Abuse and Human Violence, Schools of Social Work with Animal Curricula or Contacts, https://www.animalsandsociety.org/about-asi/website-reprint-and-use-policies, Sign Up for the Human-Animal Studies Monthly Report, Check out the articles in Society & Animals, 28(4). Therefore, it is necessary to understand the social and conceptual basis for what is widely termed “animal rights.” The agricultural community has mistakenly tended to dismiss this new thinking as fringe and emotionally based. Animal rights. Table of contents only. Society & Animals, 18(2), 163-182. Abstract: Black Veganism and the Animality Politic, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, The latest issue of the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS), 24(4) is out, Check out the latest articles in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS), 23(3). Society & Animals, 21(6), 523-545. Society & Animals, 13(2), 153-162. Society & Animals, 11(3), 245-263. Society & Animals, 19(4), 383-391. Animal rights, moral or legal entitlements attributed to nonhuman animals, usually because of the complexity of their cognitive, emotional, and social lives or their capacity to experience physical or emotional pain or pleasure. The relevance of this new moral thought to what has hitherto been understood purely in economic terms must be assimilated by the American agricultural community before the agricultural community can respond appropriately and non-reactively. (2011). Society & Animals, 23(2), 148-165. Society & Animals, 19(4), 393-406. Law and the Question of the (Nonhuman) Animal. Jamison, W. V., Wenk, C., & Parker, J. V. (2000). Gender, views of nature, and support for animal rights. Explaining support for animal rights: A comparison of two recent approaches to humans, nonhuman animals, and postmodernity. Frank, J. M. (2002). (2015). You could not be signed in. Society & Animals, 21(4), 325-340. Contributions to the Animals and Society Institute are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law. Constitutional inclusion of animal rights in Germany and Switzerland: how did animal protection become an issue of national importance?. Tauber, S. (2013). Tauber, S. (2010). This is a collection of articles on Animal Protection and Animal Rights from the Society & Animals Journal in relation to the studies of the human-animal relationship. Hansson, N., & Jacobsson, K. (2014). Jerolmack, C. (2003). Seymour, M. (2013). The politics of animal protection: A research agenda. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.